Negligent acts would be those in which someone fails to give care or attention in such a way that could be reasonably expected or is specifically required by law. Examples would include failing to properly test products for dangers before sale, medical malpractice, failing to keep premises free of hazards, or failure to keep dangerous animals under control. Examples of injurious acts not based on negligence would be things such as police brutality or malicious prosecution. These are criminal actions, but can still in some cases constitute civil action.
According to common law, the term “negligence” refers to any situation where an individual fails to exercise ordinary care. In other words, a person acts (or fails to act) negligently when he/she does not exercise the same amount of care that a typical, prudent person would exercise in the same situation. Most personal injury cases involve some form of negligence. For instance, a car accident claim might involve driver negligence, such as texting while driving or excessive speed.
A hospital could act negligently by failing to change a patient’s bandages, resulting in an infection. There are five forms of negligence: gross, comparative, contributory, mixed contributory & comparative, and vicarious. If you suffered an avoidable injury, a New York City negligence lawyer from Hecht Kleeger & Damashek, P.C., can help you file a successful lawsuit.
Some of our awards include:
Super lawyers identifies outstanding attorneys in various practice areas based on independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations.
New York County Bar Association
One of the largest, most influential bar associations in the country with NYCLA members pioneering some of the most far-reaching legal reforms in America.
New York City Bar Association
The best lawyers in NYC, the City Bar’s mission is to equip and mobilize legal professionals to practice with excellence, promote reform, and uphold the rule of law.
New York State Bar Association
The largest voluntary state bar organization in America with the goals of facilitating access to justice and elevating professional standards.
Center for Justice Democracy
The CJ&D is a non-profit, non-partisan consumer rights organization dedicated to educating the public about the U.S. civil justice system and fighting tort reform.
Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Reserved for the top trial lawyers, membership is limited to those with multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements. Fewer than 1% of lawyers are members.
American Association for Justice
The AAJ is a nonprofit advocacy and lobbying organization for plaintiff's lawyers in the U.S. with the mission to "promote a fair and effective justice system."
Gross negligence describes the actions of a person who showed little or no concern for the safety of others. Gross negligence is different than a simple, careless action. While a driver might act carelessly by taking his/her eyes of the road to adjust the radio, another driver might commit an act of gross negligence by driving recklessly. While the term “carelessness” could imply a subconscious action, gross negligence involves a blatant and conscious disregard for the life of another person.
Additionally, an act might be considered grossly negligent if it is resulted in the foreseeable danger or injury of another person. Compared to typical negligence, gross negligence is extreme and does not align with the actions of a normal, cautious person. In New York law, gross negligence is more than a heightened form of simple negligence; it is an entirely different act that implies some form of intentional misconduct.
Comparative negligence occurs when the injured party (the plaintiff) is responsible for a portion of his/her injuries; however, comparative negligence only applies when the victim is marginally responsible for his her suffering. In this situation, the plaintiff may not be able to collect full compensation for medical bills, missed wages, and other damages.
For example: a driver could run a stop sign and crash into another vehicle, injuring the other driver. However, the other driver is could be comparatively negligent if he/she failed to wear a seat belt. In this situation, the injured driver is partially responsible for the damages because he/she did not take reasonable care to wear a safety restraint. Similarly, a pedestrian would be somewhat responsible for his/her injuries if he/she failed to use a crosswalk.
The term “vicarious liability” applies to circumstances where the defendant is held responsible for the actions of another person or an animal. Dog bite lawsuits are founded on vicarious liability. If a dog owner neglects to warn guests that his/her pet is dangerous, the owner will be held vicariously liable for any injuries caused by the dog.
Vicarious liability can also apply to injuries caused by children or minors, where the parent or guardian of the child is considered responsible for the child’s actions. In some cases, young children are considered incapable of committing negligence.
Employer negligence claims can involve vicarious liability as well. For example, employers are responsible to train their employees; if an employer neglects to provide adequate training, a new employee could make a mistake and cause an accident or injury. Although the employer did not actually commit the act of negligence, he/she may be somewhat responsible for the employee’s actions. This is especially likely when the employer oversees a dangerous work environment, such as a construction site.
Watch a video about the firm:
Our legal team has the experience and record of success you can trust. If you’re suffering and think you need a lawyer, we can help and know what it takes to win.Learn More About the Firm
Many personal injury claims and lawsuits are founded on three concepts: negligence, duty of care, and breach of duty. Generally speaking, an individual commits negligence when he/she fails to act in with due regard for the health and safety of others. For instance, a driver might be considered negligent for talking on the phone or texting behind the wheel. In order to file a successful negligence lawsuit, you must be able to demonstrate that the defendant committed an act of negligence. Negligence can also refer to a person who fails to act, resulting in an injury or death.
Duty of care does not exclusively refer to medical malpractice claims. According to common law, anyone can owe duty of care while executing an act that might place another person in danger. In other words, duty of care is a circumstantial, legal obligation held by a person whose actions could cause foreseeable harm to someone else. In a negligence case, the plaintiff must demonstrate a close connection between his/her injury or illness and the actions of the defendant. Further, the plaintiff must show that the defendant’s actions placed the plaintiff in foreseeable danger.
The term “breach of duty” is a common phrase in personal injury law and refers to an individual who fails to provide duty of care. If the court determines that the defendant owed duty of care, the plaintiff must be able to show that the defendant breached his/her duty. Like any other negligence case, the defendant breaches duty of care when he/she acts unreasonably. If the defendant exercised the same amount of caution that a rational person would, the court may not find him/her liable for the defendant’s injury.
In order to prove negligence, you must be able to demonstrate that the defendant caused or contributed to your accident and injury. If you are unable to establish causation, you may not be able to collect financial compensation for your damages. Once the plaintiff demonstrates that the defendant acted negligently, he/she must draw a connection between the defendant’s negligence and the injury.
Negligence alone is not enough to establish a successful personal injury case. If you would have suffered an injury regardless of the plaintiff’s actions, you may not have a realistic case for negligence or breach of duty. This element is often called “but-for” causation. In other words: But-for the actions of the defendant, plaintiff would not have suffered the injury. Without “but-for” causation, it may be difficult to establish breach of duty.
If you suffered an avoidable personal injury, you may be entitled to financial compensation through a negligence lawsuit. Our firm has years of experience in the legal field. Let us use our understanding of personal injury law to help you recover the financial compensation that you deserve.
To see what Hecht Kleeger & Damashek, P.C., can do for your case, contact us today. With the right New York City negligence attorney on your side, you can have peace of mind that a skilled legal professional will help you through every step of the legal process.
“I cannot recommend Jon Damashek highly enough. I attribute the favorable outcome of my case to his consummate and tireless dedication and tenacity. Just as important, he was truly there with me every step of the way. He was very…
“I had the opportunity to work with Jon Damashek and had an amazing experience. I have known Jon for many years and always felt very comfortable relying on his expertise, knowledge of the law, and more importantly – his ability…
I had the opportunity of having this amazing team of lawyers work on my case. When I first met with Jordan Hecht and Michael Kusz, I really liked their energy and the spunk that they had, it meant business and…
I cannot recommend Jon Damashek highly enough. I attribute the favorable outcome to my case to his consummate and tireless dedication and tenacity. Just as important, he was truly there with me every step of the way. He was very…
I had the opportunity to work with Jon Damashek and had an amazing experience. I have known Jon for many years and always felt very comfortable relying on his expertise and knowledge of the law and more importantly his ability…
I have worked with countless attorneys over the years and Jon Damashek stands out among them. I have seen first hand him advocate for his clients vigorously. He fights for the rights of the seriously injured, does not back down…
I know all three named partners at this firm and highly recommend them. They are very professional and tireless advocates for their clients. If you need a personal injury attorney, you cannot do better than Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek.
After meeting with Jon Damashek I knew immediately he was the right attorney for me. I had met with other attorneys in the past, but Jon’s experience, knowledge, and track record were most impressive. I highly recommend Jon Damashek and…
After meeting a half dozen lawyers at different firms, I decided to go to Hecht, Kleeger and Damashek. As soon as I met Jon Damashek, I knew I had to look no further. Mr. Damashek made me feel at ease…
I retained Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek for a serious personal injury case. They were very professional and managed to obtain a settlement for me that far exceeded my expectations. I would strongly recommend this firm for anyone’s legal needs.